10 Comments

Houston has been a complete disaster of urban sprawl due to a decades long policy of no zoning controls whatsoever, so though they may have some great new policies, you did "clickbait" me into the piece by saying London could learn from Houston.

One interesting area where London can learn closer to home is Croydon. Yes, Croydon, and more particularly the southern suburbs, where (up until the new mayor was elected and cancelled it), they had a policy of allowing houses and bungalows to be bought and then developed into flats (often 6 to 9 with designs that were sympathetic to the local designs, though, tbh, most were bland 1930s urban expansion). This has added, relative to every other borough in London, a LOT of new housing and also, empirically, dampened house price inflation in the area. Oh, but it did create a lot of NIMBY response, plus some perceived corruption between developers and senior civil servants and councillors. Plus ca change etc

Expand full comment
author

I recommend reading the linked piece on Houston. They've done significant densification around their inner core. Yes, it is still sprawl-y but I think that's inevitable in a place that's so hot that walking to the shops/work is a no-go in parts of the summer.

Expand full comment

So probably something between the status quo and what Croydon did would be a good ask for the politicians that would be politically viable for them to achieve.

Expand full comment

Hi

Expand full comment

I understand the inner core has improved, simply that the issue with Houston (and most US cities, Houston is one of the worst) is the suburban sprawl. So disastrous in so many ways, not least that it is hotter than the sun there in summer so everyone drives from AC to AC. No walking ever.

Expand full comment

A lot of that could simply be included in the new National Development Management Policies. That takes it out of the Mayors hands, and it would apply everywhere else in England too.

Expand full comment
author

I'm very interested in them, but not sure how far they can be pushed at this stage.

Expand full comment

A lot of interesting stuff here. But allowing grade 2 listed or conservation area properties to be extended is almost certainly not politically viable.

No way the MIMBY (maybe in my backyard) homeowners would go along with that. And don’t forget homeowners are still 75-80% of the voters across the country - and probably more in the swing districts.

Expand full comment
author

There's precedent with Tottenham. And I think the key is allowing in sensitive ways (e.g. via strict design codes)

Expand full comment
Apr 11·edited Apr 11

Ok fair enough. But how would it go down in Uxbridge for example?

Expand full comment