A point on transport links. I live in the South West which has fast and reliable trains to London but a season ticket from Swindon to Paddington (55 mins) is over £11k a year, making it unaffordable to all but high earners.
Good point. My husband would like to take the next step in his career but so many jobs in his industry are in London (we're in Swindon) and we can't afford to spend £11k on train travel. So for now he's staying where he is. If an amazing job came up he'd have to drive all or part of the way which would be a nightmare journey also.
Agree entirely on apprenticeship levy - the German system is based on employers running it, not the education system (suspect there is a definition effect here in how trainees are counted if German figures for “on the job” training are low)
same in United States - death by legal asphyxiation. We need fewer regulations, fewer lawyers, but more accountability - if you promise to deliver something then you must deliver it roughly on time and with agreed-upon quality or face real consequences other than more lawyers and bureaucrats. US Example: EV charging infrastructure.
Agree with much of this, but not the premise that lurks behind your housing supply solution. On standard theory the fact that there's no difference in AHC incomes in London versus elsewhere is a feature of land, not a bug that can be fixed. Land (largely) captures the urban surplus and it's therefore inevitable that the cost of building a house is much less than the cost of the property. As you build and boost agglomeration in a city, productivity rises and land values follow. So yes, by all means build in cities to boost agglomeration, but you can't change AHC incomes that way.
The comparison you mention between Birmingham and Lyon relates to two observations I'v seen made elsewhere:
1. UK has smallest floor space per resident in Europe
2. UK NIMBYs perceive that the countryside is being concreted over more so than other European countries.
Both could be true (yes i'm, not sure about 2 but lets ride that train) only if the UK has the worst height restrictions on residential properties. Abolish the regulations on height or just devolve the regulations to LAs and job done.
A point on transport links. I live in the South West which has fast and reliable trains to London but a season ticket from Swindon to Paddington (55 mins) is over £11k a year, making it unaffordable to all but high earners.
Good point. My husband would like to take the next step in his career but so many jobs in his industry are in London (we're in Swindon) and we can't afford to spend £11k on train travel. So for now he's staying where he is. If an amazing job came up he'd have to drive all or part of the way which would be a nightmare journey also.
Agree entirely on apprenticeship levy - the German system is based on employers running it, not the education system (suspect there is a definition effect here in how trainees are counted if German figures for “on the job” training are low)
same in United States - death by legal asphyxiation. We need fewer regulations, fewer lawyers, but more accountability - if you promise to deliver something then you must deliver it roughly on time and with agreed-upon quality or face real consequences other than more lawyers and bureaucrats. US Example: EV charging infrastructure.
Agree with much of this, but not the premise that lurks behind your housing supply solution. On standard theory the fact that there's no difference in AHC incomes in London versus elsewhere is a feature of land, not a bug that can be fixed. Land (largely) captures the urban surplus and it's therefore inevitable that the cost of building a house is much less than the cost of the property. As you build and boost agglomeration in a city, productivity rises and land values follow. So yes, by all means build in cities to boost agglomeration, but you can't change AHC incomes that way.
The comparison you mention between Birmingham and Lyon relates to two observations I'v seen made elsewhere:
1. UK has smallest floor space per resident in Europe
2. UK NIMBYs perceive that the countryside is being concreted over more so than other European countries.
Both could be true (yes i'm, not sure about 2 but lets ride that train) only if the UK has the worst height restrictions on residential properties. Abolish the regulations on height or just devolve the regulations to LAs and job done.